row2k
- Submit Results!
- Submit your races
- SPECIAL COVERAGE
- about | faq | search



row2k Newsletter

subscribe
unsubscribe
Support row2k!

NCAA to Adopt Automatic Qualifiers, Eliminate Awards for Individual Events for women's rowing

September 18, 2009
Bookmark and Share


The NCAA Championships/Sport Management Cabinet voted this past Wednesday to adopt automatic qualifiers for the DI championship, and to eliminate award recognition for the top three crews in each event (the Varsity 8, Second Varsity 8, and Varsity 4), such that only the top four teams will be given medals, according to several reliable sources. The changes will become effective at the 2011 championship. row2k will have a more complete report next week when the NCAA approves and releases the results of the vote.

A conference must support at least six varsity teams to be eligible for an automatic qualifier spot; as a result, the following six conferences will be granted automatic qualifier spots: Atlantic- 10, Atlantic Coast, Big East, Big Ten, Ivy, and Pac-10. As a result, the top team from each of these conferences will get an automatic bid to the 2011 championship, while the remaining 10 team spots in the championship will be selected on an at-large basis based on results.

Not more than 50% of all bids to the championship can be granted by automatic qualifier; with two more conferences are slated to join this group in the next two years, rowing will max out their AQ spots in 2013, at eight of the 16 invitations. In the event that a ninth conference supports six women's rowing squads, there is a two-year waiting period before the conference would be granted an AQ, and subsequently the Cabinet would return to the issue.

For the elimination of awards, the logic appears to be that individual awards are not given out at NCAA team championships, so without the change rowing would be a sole exception in this regard. Some opponents of the elimination of awards have noted that unfortunately it creates the reverse situation from the perspective of the rowing community, in that women's collegiate rowing become the sole exception within the sport worldwide by not giving out awards to the winner of each specific championship event.

Both of the changes were arguably set into motion when women's rowing was designated as strictly a "team sport" two years ago, as opposed to the "individual team sport" classification that had prevailed since rowing became an NCAA sport in 1997. The move to the team sport classification was made to ensure the expansion of the championship, with the outcome that 16 full teams won invitations, rather than the multiple teams and limited number of at-large Varsity eights that previously were invited. Prior to the vote, rowing was the only team sport not selected at least in part by AQ's, the issue of AQ's was heavily debated within the rowing community, and resulted in a nearly even split, with many in strong support, and others strongly opposed. The elimination of gold, silver and bronze medals, however, appears somewhat to be fallout of the law of unintended consequences, and a large number of coaches have expressed regret at this development.

At present, it still remains for the NCAA proper to review and approve the changes; more next week when the NCAA releases the official announcement of the vote and changes.


Comments

Log in to comment
Johnsw116
09/18/2009  5:59:03 PM
Is this today April 1st?

Beauregard
09/18/2009  10:46:03 AM
The qualification system was seriously nonsensical before, now it is beyond idiotic. The number 16 is one completely thoughtless beginning point. Why apply a 'sweet sixteen', 'final four' qualification system to a sport which historically uses multiples of six? Can't numbers be specific to the sport? Applying a final/semi final system to a six lane race is ridiculous! So, why does rowing have to get rid of the first, second and third place medals because of rigid rules within the NCAA? Is the lawyering up (or rather ADing up) so dense that there can be no unique rules in a sport within the NCAA.? Sorry state of affairs if so...

mhcopa
09/18/2009  10:16:45 AM
This makes me very thankfull that I am a male college rower and thus dont have to put up with stuff like this.

123wisco
09/18/2009  9:05:44 AM
This is great for the sport as it will give more teams a reason to be! The awards are similar to basketball, football and so on. The rowing coaches wanted a Team Sport and now they have a Team sport. Would rowing be better served to have it be an Individual Team Sport? That would open up the slots to the actual FASTEST boats in each class, what a concept?

steve1
09/18/2009  7:05:30 AM
Wow! We did this to our sport! I would be fine with auto qualifier if we had more teams there, but the awards? The winner of the varsity eight will always be considered national champions to me!

Write row2k | row2k Home | Copyright © 1997-2009 row2k media. All Rights Reserved. | Privacy Policy